Pharmaco-invasive vs. facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention strategies for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction patients in the new ESC Guidelines.

نویسنده

  • Andros Tofield
چکیده

The role of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the early hours of an ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) can be divided into primary PCI, PCI combined with pharmacological reperfusion therapy, and ‘rescue PCI’ after failed pharmacological reperfusion. Primary PCI can be defined as coronary angioplasty/stenting without prior administration of fibrinolytic agents or GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. These patients are usually treated with aspirin, a loading dose of clopidogrel together with heparin or bivalirudin, before the intervention. Facilitated PCI is defined as a pharmacological reperfusion treatment delivered prior to a planned PCI, in order to bridge the PCI-related time delay. With this strategy it is important to emphasize that the decision to perform PCI is already taken before the additional pharmacological reperfusion treatment has been started. Full-dose lytic therapy, half-dose lytic therapy with a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor alone have been tested for this indication. There is no evidence of a significant clinical benefit with any of these agents. In spite of pre-PCI coronary artery patency rates being higher with lytic-based treatments, no mortality benefit, but more bleeding complications, was observed. The pre-PCI patency rates with upfront abciximab or high-bolus dose tirofiban alone were also not higher than with placebo, but more complete ST-segment resolution and/or a higher myocardial blush grade at angiography (but no clinical benefit) were observed with this strategy. It is unclear why all these trials have failed to show a benefit for the patient. In the case of full-dose lytic treatment, suboptimal antithrombotic co-therapy (e.g. no upfront clopidogrel) and recruitment of patients many hours after the onset of symptoms (and therefore a reduced chance to save more ischaemic myocardium) have certainly played a significant role. One might question whether upfront administration of a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist followed by PCI should be considered facilitated PCI in the absence of improved patency in the infarcted artery. A pharmaco-invasive strategy can be defined as pharmacological reperfusion (using fibrinolytic agents) with an ‘invasive back-up’, which means that patients are transported to a PCI hospital for either immediate rescue PCI in case of failed fibrinolysis or nonurgent coronary angiography to determine the need for additional treatment of the culprit lesion (PCI or bypass surgery). This strategy has been shown to be superior to a very conservative approach of in-hospital fibrinolysis with transfer to a PCI centre only in case of failed thrombolysis. The new ESC guidelines recommend the performance of a coronary angiogram 3–24 h after successful thrombolysis (.50% resolution of ST-segment elevation, reperfusion arrhythmia, disappearance of chest discomfort). This time window is justified, on the one hand, by the fear of thrombotic complications when an intervention is performed immediately following the administration of the lytic agent due to its prothrombotic effects and, on the other hand, of spontaneous re-infarction which is much more frequent in the first days following lytic therapy. Primary PCI within the recommended guidelines time window cannot be offered to all patients, not even with a well-functioning network of ambulances and hospitals. For some of these patients, especially those presenting very early without an increased risk of bleeding, immediate lytic therapy (in the ambulance or the emergency department of the community hospital) is still the best treatment, provided they can be transferred to a PCI hospital for rescue PCI, or for angiography, in order to decide on final treatment of the culprit lesion (PCI, bypass surgery or in some cases no mechanical treatment). Ideally, these patients should be transported to the PCI hospital immediately after starting lytic therapy. On arrival at the PCI hospital, a new ECG should be taken and the decision made to perform angiography either immediately or within 24 h. Reference: current ESC STEMI Guidelines.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Prehospital and interhospital delay in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and strategies to improve it from the perspective of the process owners: The importance of time

Introduction: Fibrinolytic drugs are one of the important strategies for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation, especially in small centers. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the distance with the global standard for fibrinolytic treatment and the viewpoints of experts in this regard. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional st...

متن کامل

Weaknesses in regional primary coronary angioplasty programs: is there still a role for a pharmaco-invasive approach?

All guidelines recommend primary percutaneous coronary intervention as the default strategy for achieving reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. These recommendations are based upon randomized trials which compared primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stand-alone intravenous fibrinolysis. Since the time these trials were performed, however, it has been sh...

متن کامل

No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction, Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Study of Predictive Factors

  Introduction: No-reflow phenomenon in coronary vessels, manifested in some patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction (MI), is associated with poor clinical and functional outcomes. Therefore, evaluation of predisposing risk factors can be helpful in risk assessment and identification of patients at higher risk. Herein, we aimed to study the predictive factors for the development of...

متن کامل

Comparison of in-Hospital Outcome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Between Patients with Anterior Myocardial Infarction and Those With or Without Ramus Intermedius

Introduction: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is used for the treatment of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Anterior STEMI is associated with adverse outcomes, and it is possible that the presence of ramus intermedius (RI) would inversely affect the outcome. This research involved the evaluation of the influence of RI presence on clinical ou...

متن کامل

Evaluation of ejection fraction in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a reperfusion strategy to increase life expectancy and ejection fraction (EF) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. We investigated the effect of location, severity, type of lesion, number and type of vessel involved and time of angioplasty on the increase in EF in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI (P-PCI) a...

متن کامل

Primary aortic sarcoma with multiple metastatic sites.

Leclercq F, Silvain J, Duclos F, Aout M, Dubois-Rande JL, Barthelemy O, Ducrocq G, Bellemain-Appaix A, Payot L, Steg PG, Henry P, Spaulding C, Vicaut E. Immediate vs delayed intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2009;302:947–954. 6. Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, Steg PG, Bassand JP, Faxon DP, Afzal R, Chrolavicius S, Jolly SS, Widimsky P, Avezum A, Ruppr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • European heart journal

دوره 30 23  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009